SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 165

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUNSHI (DECEASED) – Appellant
Versus
NIKKA SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on :-25.03.2026 Date of Pronouncement:- 09.04.2026 Uploaded on:- 10.04.2026 Munshi (Deceased) Through his LRs and Others … Appellants Versus Nika Singh and Others ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. P.S. Chahal, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocate for the appellants.

Respondent Nos. 1, 2(ii), (iv) are proceeded against ex-parte vide order dated 26.08.2025.

Service of respondent No.5 dispensed with vide order dated 26.08.2025.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. The appellants–plaintiffs have instituted the present Regular Second Appeal (here-in-after referred to as “RSA”) assailing the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Amritsar, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondents–defendants was allowed, the judgment and decree rendered by the learned trial Court were set aside, and, as a consequence thereof, the suit instituted by the appellants–

plaintiffs came to be dismissed.

2. Briefly stated, the appellant–plaintiff instituted a suit seeking a declaration to the effect that he is the owner in possession of the suit property, fully detailed and descr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top