IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Date of Decision.: 09.04.2026 Gurtej Singh @ Gurtej Singh Gill and Another …..Appellants Vs.

Charanjit Kaur and Others .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for the appellants.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

The plain(cid:30)ffs, having failed before the learned first appellate Court, are in Regular Second Appeal challenging the judgment & decree dated 31.03.2023 passed by the learned Addi(cid:30)onal District Judge, Moga, whereby the appeal preferred by the defendants was allowed; the judgment & decree dated 03.11.2016 passed by the learned trial Court decreeing the suit for specific performance was set aside, and the suit of the plain(cid:30)ffs stood dismissed.

2. The factual matrix giving rise to the present lis is that the plain(cid:30)ffs ins(cid:30)tuted a suit for possession by way of specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 21.02.2004 in respect of land measuring 93 kanal, asser(cid:30)ng that defendant No.1 had executed the agreement on her own behalf and as an alleged a6orney of the remaining defendants No. 2 to 6, and had received a sum of ₹50,000/- as