IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 09.04.2026 Mamtesh ...Appellant Versus Bala and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present:- Mr. Manjit Singh Gahlawat, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. S.K. Bishnoi, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.
*****
KIRTI SINGH , J. (Oral)
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 10.09.2021 passed by the learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Sonipat in Sessions Case No.SC/91/2019 in FIR No.382, dated 24.07.2018, registered under Sections 323, 328, 406, 34 and 498-A of IPC, whereby respondents were acquitted of the charges framed against them.
2. Brief factual matrix of the case at hand is that a complaint was moved by the complainant stating therein that her marriage was solemnized with respondent No.2 four years ago. Out of the said marriage, two children were born. It was alleged that soon after the marriage, respondent Nos.1 and 2 used to physically and mentally harass her for the sake of dowry. On the birth of her first child, her in-laws demanded a gold chain. Subsequently, before the birth of her second child
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.