IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 07.04.2026 Pronounced on: 16.04.2026 Uploaded on: 17.04.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment Sanjay S/o Late Sh. Brij Mohan …Petitioner Versus Sanjay S/o Late Sh. Bansi Lal …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Argued by:- Mr. Virender Soni, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Monika Tanwar, Legal Aid Counsel and Mr. Nikhil Vats, Advocate for the respondent.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J

1. The petitioner–accused has filed the present revision petition against the impugned order dated 14.10.2022 passed by Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak in CRA No.242-2018 titled as “Sanjay son of Late Sh. Brij Mohan versus Sanjay son of Late Sh. Bansi Lal”, whereby Learned Appellate Court, vide the impugned order, dismissed the application filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 391 Cr.P.C. for leading additional evidence.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint are that the respondent-complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 420 IPC against the petitioner–accused,