SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9688

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANUJ KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


CRM-M-2979-2026 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2979-2026 (O&M)

Anuj Kumar Singh ....Petitioner versus Union of India ....Respondent Date of Decision: April 16, 2026 Date of Uploading: April 17, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Preetinder Singh Ahluwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate, Ms. Kadambari Bhan, Advocate and Mr. Lovejeet Poonia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Deify Jindal, Advocate and Ms. Anju Bansal, Advocate for the respondent – NCB.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J.

The concept of personal liberty is the bedrock of a constitutional democracy, a primordial right so inextricably linked to human dignity, that one cannot conceive of meaningful existence in its absence. It is neither a gift of the state nor a creature of the codified statutes, rather it is a pre-political and inherent attribute of humanity that the law merely seeks to recognize and fortify. The antiquity of this reverence is evidenced by the fact that as early as 13th Century, long before the contemporary lexicon of human rights was articulated, Clause 39 of Magna Carta (1215) decreed that no free

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top