IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.128 CRM-M-20192-2026 Date of Decision: 16.04.2026 VINOD KUMAR ...Petitioner Versus M/S MAITRI MOTORS ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS for quashing of the impugned order dated 17.11.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram in complaint under Section 138/141/142/143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act bearing No. NACT/16533/2020 dated 27.08.2020, whereby the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C./ Section 348 BNSS filed by the respondents/complainant was allowed.

2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of the present petition are that the complainant had moved an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. stating that due to inadvertence, the Special Power of Attorney executed by the proprietor namely Aridaman Singh in favour of Chander Mohan could not be placed on record at the time of filing of the complaint. It was further pleaded that Chander Mohan was only an authorised signatory of M/s Maitri Motors and his father Aridam