SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9745

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TINKU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

217 *****

CRM-M No.11260 of 2026 Date of decision : 16.4.2026 Date of uploading : 16.4.2026 Tinku ………….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Arun Luthra, Advocate and Ms. Mehak Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Grewal, DAG, Haryana ---

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.118 dated 23.4.2024 under Section 302 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar, Sonipat.

2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the present petition by the petitioner) is as follows:-

‘To The SHO Police Station Sadar, Sonepat It is prayed that I am Deepak S/O Shamsher Singh Caste Jat R/O House No 263 Model Town, near Ram Sharnam, Sonipat. Last year my father Shamsher Singh had been running a tea shop at near T-Point, Sec 12 and now since 7-8 months that shop has been closed down. That today on 22/04/2024 at about 2 O'CLOCK my father Shamsher singh went out from my house for walking. That my mother Rekha to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top