SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 28096

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURINDER BAKSHI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

251 CRM-M-31523-2025 SURINDER BAKSHI AND ANR ....PETITIONERS V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ....RESPONDENTS Date of decision: 16.04.2026 Date of Uploading: 16.04.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. B.D. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepak Kumar Grewal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*****

SUMEET GOEL , J . ORAL

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.0239 dated 23.10.2015 under Sections 406, 420, 120-B, 424, 467, 468, 471, 506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Mullana, Ambala and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 26.02.2019 (Annexure P-2), which is stated to have been effected between the parties.

2. On 12.03.2026, the following order was passed:

“The petitioner has approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a compromise having been effected between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that all concerned are parties to the present petition in terms of the dict

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top