SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9784

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAMBU SAHNI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:12.02.2026 Sambu Sahni ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Inderjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Beant Singh Seemar, Advocate for the complainant.

...

Manisha Batra, J. (Oral).

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking benefit of anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR No.237, dated 10.12.2025, registered under Section 108 of the BNS, at Police Station Machhiwara, Police District Khanna, District Ludhiana.

2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement recorded by the complainant – Kavita Devi on 10.12.2025, alleging therein that her husband Rajesh Kumar was indulged in gambling activities. The petitioner along with co-accused used to lend money to him for gambling purpose and in lieu thereof, used to charge double amount of money, due to which her husband had incurred heavy debts and had to pay them to the petitioner and co-accused, who frequently, used to visit their house, raised demand of their money from her husband and had been extending threats to him to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top