IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SAVITRI AND ORS. ......Appellants Vs.

RAJBIR SINGH AND ANR. ......Respondents Reserved on: 04.02.2026 Pronounced on: 12.02.2026 Uploaded on: 13.02.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Arvind Singh, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2-Insurance Co.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 12.04.2008 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohtak (in short ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellants/claimants to the tune of Rs.1,46,777/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum on account of injuries sustained by the appellants/claimants – Ram Chander (since deceased) in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on

18.09.2006.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of