SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9802

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNIL ARORA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-

CRM-M-8000-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision : 12.02.2026 Sunil Arora ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. P.K.Rohilla, Advocate and Mr. D.K.Rohilla, Advocate for the petitioner.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)

1. This is the first petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, namely Sunil Arora, in the event of his arrest in FIR No.01 dated 01.01.2026, registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station City Karnal, District Karnal, Haryana.

2. Brief facts of the case are that FIR No.01 dated 01.01.2026 under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station City, Karnal, District Karnal, has been lodged on the complaint of the complainant alleging that the petitioner–accused Sunil Arora, who is running a jewellery shop in the name and style of “S.K. Jewellers, Karnal”, induced the complainant to invest money in gold on the pretext that the amount would be doubled within 5–6 months.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top