IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HIMANSHU SHARMA @ KUKU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 13.02.2026 Himanshu Sharma @ Kuku …Petitioner.
Versus State of Haryana …Respondent.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY.
Present: Mr. D.S. Matya, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Shweta Nahata, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Akash, Advocate for the complainant.
****
AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J. (Oral)
1. Petitioner, who is an accused in case FIR No. 507 dated 27.10.2025, registered against him under Sections 109(1), 115, 287, 3(5), 351(2) of BNS and Section 25/54/59 of Arms Act, at Police Station Palam Vihar, District Gurugram, has filed the present 2nd petition for grant of anticipatory bail. His earlier petition seeking similar relief was dismissed by this Court vide detailed order dated 11.12.2025 passed in CRM-M-70035-
2025 (Annexure P-4). Same is reproduced hereinafter:-
“1. Petitioner, an accused in case bearing FIR No.507 dated 27.10.2025 registered against him at Police Station Palam Vihar, District Gurugram, for the commission of offences punishable u/s 109(1), 115, 287, 3(5), 351(2) of BNS and Sections 25/54/59 of Arms Act, has prayed for grant of pre-
arrest bail.
2. Relevant facts as emerging from documents on record be no
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.