SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77083

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
INDRAWATI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
JAIDEEP @ JAGDEEP AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH INDRAWATI AND ORS ......Appellants Vs.

JAIDEEP @ JAGDEEP AND ANR ......Respondents Reserved on: 19.12.2025 Pronounced on: 13.02.2026 Uploaded on : 17.02.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Balraj Singh Rathee, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Ms. Manvi Verma, Advocate for Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.2-Insurane Company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

CM-9571-CII-2022

1. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for condonation of delay of 1021 days in filing the appeal.

2. Notice in the application.

3. Mr. Balraj Singh Rathee, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and Ms. Manvi Verma, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2-Insurane Company and contends that they have no objection if the application is allowed.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that appellants would not ask for interest for the delayed period.

5. For the rea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top