IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANUJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 13.02.2026 Anuj ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Gagandeep Sanwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana.
*****
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL)
1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.193 dated 12.05.2025 registered under Sections 103(1), 61 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25/54/49 of the Arms Act, at Police Station City Gohana, District Sonepat.
2. Brief facts of the present case are that due to some old enmity, the petitioner along with other co-accused, brutally attacked and caused injuries to one Ajay (brother of the complainant), who subsequently succumbed to his injuries. Hence, the present FIR.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He argued that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR, nor has any concern with the said offence. He further argued that the petitioner was not even present at the spot o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.