SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 44920

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 05.02.2026 Pronounced on: 13.02.2026 Uploaded on: 16.02.2026 VIJAY KUMAR PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Argued by: Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tarranum Madan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG Punjab. Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R.S. Bagga, Advocate for the complainant.

***

Shalini Singh Nagpal, J.

1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.05 dated 05.11.2020 under Section 498-A IPC, Police Station NRI Jalandhar Rural, Punjab and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. FIR was registered on complaint of Kirandeep Kaur, wife of Mulkh Raj, resident of Nangal Khurd, Police Station Bhogpur, District Jalandhar, at that time residing in USA. Complainant stated that she was a citizen of USA and was married with Vijay Kumar on 11.03.2011. She had a five-year old son from the marriage. Her husband was also residing in Queens Village, New York 11427 while her parents-in-law, sisters-in-law were residing at Jalandhar. They all supported Vijay Kumar to fraudulently marry her. After seven years of marriage, she f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top