IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
203 Date of decision: 13.02.2026 AARTI PETITIONER VERSUS UT OF CHANDIGARH RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Dilpreet Singh Gandhi, Advocate and Ms. Jashan Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Bansal, Addl. P.P. U.T., Chandigarh ***
Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral)
1. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case vide FIR No.54 dated 23.06.2025 under Section 80 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023, Police Station North, Chandigarh, District Chandigarh. This is the first petition for anticipatory bail.
2. On 13.11.2025, following order was passed. :-
“1. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioner(s) have filed the instant petition(s) under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.54 dated 23.06.2025 registered under Section 80 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station North, Chandigarh.
2. Present FIR was registered against the petitioners on the complaint of Shri Ram Verma (father of deceased Poonam) stating therein that he had four children. On 28.4.2024, he performed the marriage of his second daughter Poonam with c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.