IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
envelope alongwith sweets, fruit baskets as token of respect. Meal was arranged for approximately 50 persons; Rs.1100/- were given to the adults and Rs.500/- to the children in cash. Thus, approximately Rs.3 lac were spent. On 10.11.2016, at the time of engagement ceremony, during demonetisation, her father was pressurised by Atul Gautam for giving cash amount for which he expressed inability but when they repeatedly raised demand, a cheque of Rs.51000/- was given. Despite all this, on 11.11.2016 behaviour of the entire family was humiliating, which they ignored. On the very next day of the marriage, her husband and all accused took the jewellery and cash received in muh dikhai in their possession. Her mother- in-law exerted pressure on her father for cheque of Rs.11,000/- and entire kanyadan on the pretext that they were going for Honeymoon. Yet, she was taunted by her mother-in-law and sister-in-law who pressurised her to give her salary and was threatened with expulsion from the house if she did not comply. Her husband Nakul Gautam took her ATM in his possession. Though, she was a victim of mental harassment, she ignored everything due to her family values. In March 2017, she be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.