IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

204 Date of Decision: 16.02.2026 KRISHAN PAL AND ORS.

...Appellants Versus COMMISSIONER, ROHTAK DIVISION, ROHTAK AND ORS.

...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.

Ms. Anu Pal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Mr. Parmod Chauhan, Advocate, respondent No.4.

*****

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL)

1. In the present appeal, the challenge is to the order dated 13.10.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP-7123-2011, titled as ‘Krishan Pal and others vs. The Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and others’, whereby writ petition was allowed and the orders of eviction dated 20.01.2011 and dated 30.08.2007 passed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 respectively, under the provisions of Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘1972 Act’) have been set aside on technical grounds.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that though the order was passed in favour of the appellants with regard to the eviction proceedings, which we