SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 28324

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64489-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 16.02.2026 Ghanaiya Ram @ Kanhaiya Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Ms. Kusum Raj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG, Punjab.

****

AMARJOT BHATTI, J.

1. Petitioner Ghanaiya Ram @ Kanhaiya Singh filed petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for setting aside impugned order dated 13.10.2025 (Annexure P-5) vide which application filed by petitioner for recording statement of concerned doctor from Francispur Hospital, Parsia, Rasra, District Balia, Uttar Pradesh through Video Conferencing in the trial in FIR No. 211 dated 19.06.2018 under Section 363, 366, 376 IPC (later on added Section 6 of POCSO Act) registered at Police Station Sahnewal, Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) has been wrongly rejected.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner argued that petitioner is accused facing trial in FIR No. 211 dated 19.06.2018 (supra). Said FIR has been lodged by complainant, who is father of alleged victim by levelling baseless allegations. Copy of aforesaid FIR is Annexure P-1.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top