IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64489-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 16.02.2026 Ghanaiya Ram @ Kanhaiya Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Ms. Kusum Raj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG, Punjab.
****
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
1. Petitioner Ghanaiya Ram @ Kanhaiya Singh filed petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for setting aside impugned order dated 13.10.2025 (Annexure P-5) vide which application filed by petitioner for recording statement of concerned doctor from Francispur Hospital, Parsia, Rasra, District Balia, Uttar Pradesh through Video Conferencing in the trial in FIR No. 211 dated 19.06.2018 under Section 363, 366, 376 IPC (later on added Section 6 of POCSO Act) registered at Police Station Sahnewal, Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) has been wrongly rejected.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner argued that petitioner is accused facing trial in FIR No. 211 dated 19.06.2018 (supra). Said FIR has been lodged by complainant, who is father of alleged victim by levelling baseless allegations. Copy of aforesaid FIR is Annexure P-1.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.