SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 28373

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
UMED AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

207 CRM-M-61057-2025 UMED AND ANOTHER ....PETITIONERS V/s STATE OF HARYANA ....RESPONDENT Date of decision: 16.02.2026 Date of uploading: 17.02.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Senior DAG, Haryana.

Ms. Garima Dikshit, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

SUMEET GOEL , J .

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case bearing FIR No. 202 dated 25.09.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 120-B of IPC, 1860 at Police Station Bhattu Kalan, District Fatehabad.

2. On 31.10.2025, the following order was passed:-

“1. Prayer in this petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.202, dated 25.09.2025, registered at Police Station Bhattu Kalan, District Fatehabad (Annexure P-1), under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 120-B of IPC, 1860.

2. Notice of motion.

3. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard and material on file h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top