SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 28399

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MOHIT GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Mohit Goyal ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana ... Respondent 1. The date when the judgment is reserved 11.02.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 16.02.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 16.02.2026 website

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mandeep Budhiraja, Advocate and Mr. Rehan Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Arun Kumar Goyat, Advocate for the complainant.

...

Manisha Batra, J. (Oral).

1. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking pre- arrest bail in case arising out of FIR No.296, dated 28.08.2024, registered under Sections 406, 420, 409, 506, 120-B IPC, at Police Station Civil Lines Jind, District Jind, on the basis of a written complaint submitted by complainant – Rajender Singh, alleging that in the year 2021, he had opened two savings bank accounts in the name of his wife and himself

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top