SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 20854

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Aaradhna Sawhney, J
Satbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRR-2802-2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Raj Kapoor Malik
For the Respondents: Shweta Nahata, Gunjan Mehta, Dinesh Arora

The power to summon an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is an extraordinary, discretionary power that must be exercised sparingly, requiring a degree of satisfaction higher than that for framing a charge and resting upon cogent, credible material rather than mechanical or contradictory assertions.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 319 - Summoning of additional accused - Power is discretionary and extraordinary, to be exercised sparingly and with due circumspection - Degree of satisfaction required is higher than that for framing of charge, requiring cogent and credible material - Power cannot be exercised in a routine or mechanical manner where no new incriminating evidence is brought on record.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the trial court's order refusing to summon two individuals as additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. The prosecution claimed they were involved in the assault resulting in the death of the deceased, despite earlier police investigations concluding they were bystanders and the complainant's own supplementary statement clarifying they did not participate.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the complainant’s attempt to implicate the individuals in court, contradicting his earlier supplementary statement, appeared to be a last-minute effort. With no fresh incriminating material on record and testimonies of various witnesses confirming the individuals were not involved in the assault, the court upheld the dismissal of the application.

Issues: Whether the trial court was justified in dismissing the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning additional accused without sufficient new evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: The power to summon an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. requires more than a mere prima facie case; it demands credible evidence that excludes the possibility of routine or mechanical exercise of power, particularly when the witness's prior statements and independent investigation negate the involvement of the persons sought to be summoned.

Result: Revision petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the petition, factual background of the case, and history of the application to summon additional accused. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the admissibility and necessity of summoning additional accused under section 319 cr.p.c. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. examination of the legal principles and scope of section 319 cr.p.c. as established by supreme court precedents. (Para 7 , 8)
4. court's application of the law to the specific facts, focusing on the absence of fresh evidence and the contradictory nature of the complainant's statements. (Para 9)

*****

AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.

1. Challenge in the present petition is to order dated 01.08.2017 passed by the then Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Kaithal vide which an application u/s 319 Cr.P.C moved by the prosecution, for summoning Roshan Lal and Ranbir @ Tini to face trial as additional accused, in case FIR No.25 dated 04.03.2017 u/s 148/149/302/323/342/356 IPC, PS Sadar Kaithal, Distt. Kaithal, was dismissed.

2. Relevant facts as emerging from documents on record be noticed hereinbelow:-

On 04.03.2017 a telephonic message was received in police station vide which the police authorities were intimated that a Brahman family of village Padla have murdered a young boy named Pardeep S/o Satbir Singh R/o Dillowali as also that another young boy namely Mohit S/o Randhir Singh R/o Malkheri, has been mercilessly thrashed by them. It also came to the notice of police authorities that dead body of Pardeep and injured Mohit have both been rushed to Govt. Hospital, Kaithal. Immediately thereafter, S.I. Subash along with other police officials reached hospital, collected ruqa and after seeking permission from the doctor on duty recorded the statement of Mohit, aged about 15-16 years, studying in class 9th and resident of village Malkheri. As per complainant on 03.03.2017, he along with his friend Pardeep (since deceased) S/o Satbir R/o village Dillowali were visiting village Sangan to attend wedding ceremony of elder brother of their friend Raju. He reached village Sangan at about 02:00 in the afternoon on the motorcycle bearing registration No.HR08W-8002 (make Splendor). One of friends of Pardeep, who was not known to him(c) was also attending the wedding. After attending the marriage ceremony in the late evening, on the asking of his friend Pardeep (since deceased), they headed for village Padla at about 11:000 p.m. as they had to leave Pardeep’s friend. The motorcycle was being driven by Pardeep, whose friend was dropped at his village at about 11:30 p.m. Thereafter, they halted in a street in front of the house of Neha. Pardeep who was on friendly terms called Neha, who came out of her house. While these two were exchanging notes with each other, suddenly Neha told Pardeep to leave quickly as she had noticed her paternal uncle Muni Ram coming towards them. Before they could react, Muni Ram ran up to them and also called other members of his family namely Binder, Shri Bhagwan, Sanjiv, Tini, and Roshan (sought to be summoned as co accused) etc. Immediately all the persons armed with dandas, lathis, etc. arrived at the spot and questioned them as to why they were talking with their daughter Neha. Before they could answer and explain themselves, the motorcycle was thrown down. He and Pardeep were dragged inside the house, where they were tied with ropes and later dragged to cattle shed opposite the house. They were mercilessly thrashed. Both, he and Pardeep begged for mercy and requested to pardon them, but no heed was paid. As a result of onslaught unleashed by the above named persons, Pardeep breathed his last at the site. His body was picked up and kept on a cart in the courtyard. At about 6-7 in the morning his and family members of Pardeep namely Sh. Satbir Singh (father of Pardeep), his father Sh. Randhir Singh and others arrived. They untied him and Pardeep. He was rushed to Govt. Hospital, Kaithal. Dead body of Pardeep was also taken to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top