IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

227 Civil Revision No.1840 of 2025 (O & M)

Date of decision :-27.03.2026 Murti Thakur Ji Maharaj Staphit Mandir Thakur Ji Maharaj …..Petitioner Versus Hanuman and others …..Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Vikas Suri, Advocate with Ms. Swati Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Dushyant Godara, Advocate for the petitioner.

None for respondents No.1 to 3(a) to 3(d) despite service.

NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)

Prayer in the present revision petition is for setting aside the order dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned District Judge, Narnaul in Civil Appeal No.120 of 2018 titled as “Hanuman and others vs. Murti Thakur Ji Maharaj”, whereby the application filed by the respondent under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC has been allowed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the impugned order is contrary to the settled position of law. It is submitted that as per the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s Eastern Equipment and Sales Ltd. vs. ING. Yash Kumar Khanna, 2008(4) RCR (Civil) 508, as well as the judgment of this Court in Surender Kumar vs. Uma Dutt and others, 2025 NCPHHC 24726 and decision date