IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

216 CRM-M-26476-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.03.2026 DEEPANSHU VERMA ...Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Sourav Gamble, Advocate and Ms. Mamta, Advocate for Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kshitij Bharti, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

****

SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 23 dated 17.02.2022 under Sections 323, 201, 506 Indian Penal Code and Section 6 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Women Police Station, Ballabhgarh, on the basis of compromise said to be arrived at between the parties.

2. Facts:

Prosecutrix ‘S’ reported that Deepanshu son of Sanjay Verma lived in her neighbourhood and she used to talk to him. 3-4 years back, Deepanshu made a pornographic video of her. One day, he took her to his friend’s house in Mirzapur, forcibly did wrong things and asked her to make video. He made her video and started blackmailing her by showing the video, threatening to make it viral. He used to talk to her on the phone and many a times, took her to OYO. He also used to