IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARUN @ ANNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARUN @ ANNU ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CRM-M-67034-2025 (O&M)
SONU @ SACHIN …Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA …Respondent
1 The date when the judgment is reserved 25.03.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 27.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 27.03.2026 website
4 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced
5 The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment and reasons thereof.
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Kapil Choudhary, Advocate, Mr. Hardik Bedi, Advocate, Mr. Sonu Chaudhary, Advocate and Ms. Geeta Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-60524-2025 Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, Mr. Yatin Mehta, Advocate, Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-67034-2025 Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana Mr. Pardeep Duhan, Advocate for the complainant ****
MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
1. This common order shall dispose of the aforementioned two petitions which have arisen out of same FIR. These petitions have been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.