SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 10108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DHEERAJ KATARIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0154 dated 17.06.2025 under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 (Section 238 BNS 2023 added later on) (Earlier section 419, 420, 467, 465, 471, 120-B and 201 of IPC, 1860)

registered at Police Station City-I Malerkotla, District Malerkotla.

2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for about 9½ months. He alleges false implication. As per the allegations, he has demarcated the land and attested as witness, however, co-accused Manpreet Kaur, who allegedly impersonated the original owner, has since been granted bail by this Court, vide Annexure P-3, after being in custody of 8 months and 1 day. The offences are triable by the Magistrate. Charges have been framed on 24.09.2025 and none, out of 16 PWs, has been examined. He is involved in 2 other cases, in 1 of which he is on bail. Reliance is placed on the judgment passed by Hon'ble The Supreme Court titled as Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi vs. State of U.P. and others, 2012(2) SCC 382

3. The custody certificate dated 27.03.2026, filed by the lear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top