SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3340

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
OM PARKASH BHATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-73087-2025 Decided on: 23.02.2026 Om Parkash Bhati …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Kartar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

Ms. Neeru Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

SANJAY VASHISTH, J.

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 102 dated 31.08.2024, under Sections 420, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Bhiwani, District Faridabad, Haryana.

2. Ms. Neeru Bansal, Advocate, appeared on behalf of complainant-respondent No. 2. Pursuant to the order dated 17.02.2026 passed by this Court, an amount of Rs. 25,000/- has been handed over by the petitioner’s counsel to the counsel representing respondent No. 2 in Court today.

3. The admitted position is that, without having any actual ownership, petitioner received an amount of Rs. 8,38,100/- from the complainant.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner on

19.01.2026, the following was recorded “1. Petitioner – Om Parkash Bhati, aged 43 years, has filed instant petition for see

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top