SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KHETA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Date of Decision:- 09.03.2026 Indraj … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent (II) CRM-M-12726-2026 (O&M)

Kheta Ram … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. S.K. Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

*****

SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (Oral)

1. Both these petitions under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, have been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.415 dated 16.08.2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 (Section 109 of BNS, 2023 added later on) (Corresponding Sections 323, 324, 149, 147, 148 and 506 of IPC) at Police Station Rania, District Sirsa, Haryana.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case as no specific role has been attributed to them. It is submitted that the petitioners were not present at the spot at the time of the alleged occurrence. It is further submitted that the injuries sustained are simple in nature and not grievo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top