SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 142

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(O&M) BHOOP SINGH ETC – Appellant
Versus
RAM SAROOP ETC – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on:25.02.2026 Pronounced on:09.03.2026 Uploaded on:17.03.2026 Bhoop Singh and others ... Appellants Versus Ram Saroop (since deceased) through LRs and another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Ankit Grewal, Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate Mr. Akshat Dalal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Hemant Bassi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Gursimran Kaur, Advocate Ms. Saloni Chhabra, Advocate for the respondents.

*****

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J.

1. The defendants are the appellants before this Court challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 17.12.1993 passed by the learned trial Court whereby the suit filed by the respondent No.1-plaintiff for possession of suit property as prayed in the plaint, was decreed as well as the impugned judgment and decree dated 22.08.1995 passed by the learned 1st Appellate Court vide which the appeal preferred against the aforesaid judgment and decree of the learned trial Court was dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties are being referred to by their original status before the learned trial Court.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top