SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3373

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARAMVIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.68104 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 Paramvir ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ ***

Present: Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. C. R. Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate for the complainant.

***

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.

1. Present petition has been filed praying for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.742, dated 22.11.2023, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station City Ballabgarh, District Faridabad.

2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that FIR in the present case was got registered on the statement of complainant, namely, Mandhir Maan, s/o Rattan Singh Mann. It was alleged that Paramvir (petitioner), Rajesh Gupta and Ranvir were involved in selling of properties and swindling money by preparing agreement with forged documents. Rajesh and Ranvir were working as property dealers and told the complainant that H. No.85, Sector 29, measuring 250 sq. Yards was for sale and Paramvir, i.e. the petitioner was the owner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top