SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KARAMBIR ALIAS KARAMVIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NARENDER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2201-2026(O&M)

Date of decision: 09.03.2026 Karambir @ Karamvir Singh ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Narender ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Revision Petition has been filed by the tenant against the order dated 17.02.2026 (Annexure P11) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Jind whereby Warrants of Possession as issued by the learned trial Court have been stayed only subject to the tendering of rent till date, by the petitioner by 02.03.2026.

2. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the judgment dated 14.05.2025 has been passed by the learned Rent Controller without appreciating the evidence on record and by ignoring the facts of the case. It is submitted that learned Rent Controller has even failed to examine the personal interest and bona fide need of the respondent. Learned counsel submits that in these circumstances, the petitioner whose appeal against the afore-mentioned judgment is pending adjudication, would suffer a huge blow if the operation of the impugned order is not stayed. It is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top