IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KARAMBIR ALIAS KARAMVIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NARENDER – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2201-2026(O&M)
Date of decision: 09.03.2026 Karambir @ Karamvir Singh ...Petitioner(s)
Vs.
Narender ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
***
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
Present Revision Petition has been filed by the tenant against the order dated 17.02.2026 (Annexure P11) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Jind whereby Warrants of Possession as issued by the learned trial Court have been stayed only subject to the tendering of rent till date, by the petitioner by 02.03.2026.
2. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the judgment dated 14.05.2025 has been passed by the learned Rent Controller without appreciating the evidence on record and by ignoring the facts of the case. It is submitted that learned Rent Controller has even failed to examine the personal interest and bona fide need of the respondent. Learned counsel submits that in these circumstances, the petitioner whose appeal against the afore-mentioned judgment is pending adjudication, would suffer a huge blow if the operation of the impugned order is not stayed. It is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.