IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-591-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 Satvir and another …..Appellants.
Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NEERJA K. KALSON Present:- Mr.Salil Dev Singh Bali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Parveen Jain, Advocate for the appellants.
Ms. Vasundhara Dalal Anand, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
****
NEERJA K. KALSON, J .
1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants challenging the order dated 03.02.2026 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court under POCSO Act, Bhiwani whereby the application filed by the appellants seeking the concession of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 194 dated 12.12.2025 under Sections 62, 75, 96, 137(2), 140(3), 239, 351(2), 353(2), 3(5) of BNS, Sections 8, 12, 21 of POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, registered at Police Station Behal, District Bhiwani, was dismissed. During the pendency of the proceedings, the complainant was duly informed by the Investigating Officer about the pendency of the present appeal.
2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.