SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-591-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 Satvir and another …..Appellants.

Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NEERJA K. KALSON Present:- Mr.Salil Dev Singh Bali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Parveen Jain, Advocate for the appellants.

Ms. Vasundhara Dalal Anand, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

****

NEERJA K. KALSON, J .

1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants challenging the order dated 03.02.2026 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court under POCSO Act, Bhiwani whereby the application filed by the appellants seeking the concession of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 194 dated 12.12.2025 under Sections 62, 75, 96, 137(2), 140(3), 239, 351(2), 353(2), 3(5) of BNS, Sections 8, 12, 21 of POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, registered at Police Station Behal, District Bhiwani, was dismissed. During the pendency of the proceedings, the complainant was duly informed by the Investigating Officer about the pendency of the present appeal.

2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top