SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 AMRIT PAL KAUR ......Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Mukul, Advocate for Mr. Binat Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Abhijeet Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)

1. The instant petition under Section 483(3) of BNSS has been filed seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal to respondent No.2 in case FIR No.874 dated 16.11.2024 under Sections 115, 351(2), 85 & 89 of BNS, registered at Police Station Sadar, District Karnal vide impugned order dated 08.04.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed in BA-1044-2025.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal granted anticipatory bail to respondent No. 2 subject to the condition that he shall join and cooperate with the Investigating/Arresting Officer and comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. It is submitted that respondent No. 2, misusing his position as a police official, has inter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top