IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

124 CWP-6792-2026 Date of Decision : March 09, 2026 PRACHI -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS

127 CWP-6852-2026 MEDHANSHU MAURYA -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS

128 CWP-6860-2026 NAZMA KHAN -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS

129 CWP-6861-2026 PAYAL -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS

132 CWP-6968-2026 TARANA SINGH -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Vishal Pundir, Advocate, Mr. Fateh Saini, Advocate, and Mr. Devansh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner (in all writ petitions).

Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate, and Ms. Nancy Antwal, Advocate for the respondents No.2 to 4 (in all writ petitions).

***

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)

1. The amenability of all these writ petitions for being decided through a common verdict generates from theirs encapsulating similar facts and common question(s) of law for consideration. For the sake of brevity and convenience, the