SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAM KISHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.146 CRA-S-245-2026 Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 RAM KISHAN ...Appellant Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Lupil Gupta, Mr. Apurv Kamboj and Mr. Jashandeep Singh, Advocates for the appellant.

Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Vikram Singh, Ms. Arushi Lamba Brar and Mr. Vishavjeet S. Beniwal, Advocates for respondents No. 2 and 3.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)

1. The present criminal appeal has been filed by Ram Kishan, appellant/complainant, challenging the order dated 16th October 2025, vide which the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda has made absolute the bail order dated 8th October 2025 and has granted anticipatory bail to respondents No. 2 and 3, namely Sukhbir Singh and Sukraj Singh.

2. The facts of the case, as emerging from the FIR are that the proceedings originated from Application No. 650517 dated 28.08.2025 submitted by complainant Ram Krishan to the authorities, which was forwarded through official channels including the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and the office of the Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda, regardin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top