SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 24162

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34903-2013 Reserved on : 16.02.2026 Pronounced on: 09.03.2026 Uploaded on : 10.03.2026 Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

..... Petitioner Versus State (Union Territory Chandigarh) and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Batra, Advocate Mr. Ishan Khetarpal, Advocate and Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. J.S. Toor, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Adhiraj Toor, Advocate and Mr. Jasbir Singh, Advocate for respondent-U.T. Chandigarh.

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition is for quashing of setting aside the impugned order dated 27.08.2012 (Annexure P-1) issuing process under Section 20 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as PFA Act) passed by Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh and quashing of proceedings in Complaint case No.PFA-282/2006 dated 22.11.2006 titled as ‘State (Chandigarh Administration) Vs. Mahesh and others’ under Sections 7 and 16 of PFA Act, read with Clause (c) of Rule 32 of the PFA Rules, 1955.

2. Succinctly, facts of the case are that the present petition aris

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top