SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 35186

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on:03.02.2026 Pronounced on: 09.03.2026.

Sushil Kumar Gupta ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Argued by :Mr. Manoj Kumar Sood, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the respondents No.2 to 4 (through VC).

SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) :

While conducting a trial for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 323, 325, 506 and 34 IPC, arising out of FIR No.320 dated 04.07.2022, Police Station Dabua District Faridabad. The learned Judicial Magistrate passed the following order on 09.10.2023:- “Accused Jitender produced before me in custody.

His presence is marked. Let, he be kept in judicial custody and be produced before the court on 23.10.2023.

PW-2 Radhey Shyam is present and this cross examination is completely recorded today. No other PW is present today. Prosecution has availed several opportunities. This Court seems no justification to grant another opportunity for prosecution evidence. Hence, the prosecution evidence is hereby closed by the court order.

Stat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top