SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SAVITA YADAV – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

......Appellants Vs.

SAVITA YADAV .....Respondent Reserved on : 16.04.2026 Pronounced on: 21.04.2026 Uploaded on: 24.04.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate and Ms. Hemlata, Advocate for the respondent.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral)

1. The present regular second appeal is preferred against judgment and decree dated 22.01.2013 passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Rewari, as well as judgment and decree dated 18.12.2013 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Rewari, whereby civil suit filed by the respondent was decreed in her favor and appeal filed by appellants was dismissed respectively.

2. Brief facts of the case, as per the civil suit are that husband of respondent, namely Yadu Yadav, was taken to Trauma Center, Rewari, due to severe head injury in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 08.06.2009 near Salhawas, Tehsil and District Jhajjar. But without giving any treatment, he was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top