SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Gurtej Singh @ Gurtej Singh Brar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurtej Singh @ Gurtej Singh Brar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 29.04.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 30.04.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 30.04.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full

4 Full judgment is pronounced The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not

5 reasons thereof applicable CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Samay Sandhawalia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Amaninder Singh Sekhon, Advocate for the complainant.

MANISHA BATRA, J.

1. The instant one is the second petition that has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to him in case arising out of FIR No. 79 dated 17.05.2024, registered under Sections 302 and 34 of IPC (both these sections were deleted and Sections 306 and 201 of IPC were added later on and then on alteration of charge, Sections 302 and 201 of IPC have been added) at Poli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top