SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77156

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHIV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


(106) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:25.05.2026 SHIV KUMAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. H.S. Jagait, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

****

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.

The prayer in this 2nd petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.373 dated 08.11.2024 under Section 22 of the NDPS Act (Section 29 of NDPS Act added later on) registered at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala.

2 The brief facts of the case are that Naveen Kumar @ Navin Kumar (granted bail vide order dated 23.04.2026 passed in CRM-M-2149- 2026) and Shiv Kumar (petitioner) were travelling on a motor cycle being driven by the Naveen Kumar @ Navin Kumar. The recovery of 1416 narcotic capsules of Dicyclomine Hydrochloride and Tramadol Hydrochloride came to be recovered from them.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The mandatory provisions of Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act had not been complied with in their proper perspectiv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top