SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77172

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SATPAL – Appellant
Versus
SARDARI LAL ETC. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 25.05.2026 Satpal (Since Deceased) through his LRs … Appellants Versus Sardari Lal and Others ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. M.L. Saini, Advocate for the respondent No.1.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The appellants/plaintiffs, being aggrieved by the decree and judgment dated 20.09.1997 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar, whereby the well-reasoned decree and judgment dated 12.11.1992 rendered by the learned Additional Senior Sub-Judge, Anandpur Sahib came to be reversed, have respectfully invoked the appellate jurisdiction of this Court through the present Regular Second Appeal (for short, “RSA”).

1.1. The appellants seek restoration of the decree lawfully granted by the learned Trial Court and consequential redress against the substantial miscarriage of justice occasioned by the impugned judgment. It is respectfully submitted that the impugned judgment and decree suffer from manifest perversity, patent errors of law, and a fundamentally erroneous appreciation of the pleadings and evi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top