IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1942-A-1986 (O&M)

Date of decision: 19.05.2026 Purni (D) through her LR Mehar Singh (D) through his LRs ...Appellant Versus Gurnam Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. S. S. Kamboj, Advocate and Mr.Manvir Singh Kamboj, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. B. D. Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

INDEX Sr.No Paragraphs Pages .

1. Challenge in the present appeal 1 1-2 2. Arguments on behalf of the 2-6 2-4 appellant

3. Arguments on behalf of the 7-9 4-7 respondents

4. Analysis and findings 10-49 7-33 CHALLENGE IN THE PRESENT APPEAL

1. Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment dated 31.01.1985 passed by the trial Court vide which the suit filed by the plaintiffs-respondents no.1 to 3 for specific performance of the agreement dated 07.12.1979 has been decreed. Challenge is also to the judgment dated

22.03.1986 of the Ist Appellate Court vide which the appeal filed by the present appellant has been dismissed.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT

2. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in the present case the suit for specific performance filed by