SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77301

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sandeep ….Petitioner versus State of Haryana ….Respondent Date of decision: March 18, 2026 Date of Uploading: March 18, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) (earlier Section 438 of Cr. P.C.) seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case bearing FIR No.0236 dated 20.04.2026, under Sections 115, 190, 191(3), 333, 351(3), 308(4)

of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station Kharkhoda, District Sonipat, Haryana.

2. The gravamen of the allegations against the petitioner is that he, along with the co-accused, formed an unlawful assembly and, in furtherance of their common object, arrived at the spot to extort money from the complainant. It is further alleged that they caused injuries to the complainant in the course of committing the extortion and also extended threats to kill him.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that a bare perusal of the FIR would reveal that the allegations l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top