IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNNY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
CRM-M_23087_2026
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-23087-2026 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(204) CRM-M-23087-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision : 15.05.2026
SUNNY ... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab
***
MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section
482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) seeking
grant of anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR No.383 dated 18.12.2022
registered under Sections 336, 452, 148, 149, 427 of IPC and Sections 25 and 27
of the Arms Act at Police Station Civil Lines, Batala, District Gurdaspur.
2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement
got recorded by the complainant Kashmir Kaur alleging that on the evening of
17.12.2022, she came out of her house to buy milk and as soon as she opened
main gate of her house, accused Rashpal Singh @ Ghuddu, Sonu accompanied
by some unknown persons were found creating ruckus on the street. On seeing
her, the accused Rashpal Singh @ Ghuddu made an exhortation to catch-hold of
her. Then all of them entered inside her house, after breaking open the main
AMIT SHARMA
2026.05.15 13:04
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE2##CRM-M-23087-2026 (O&M) 2
gate. They were armed with weapons and one of them fired in the air. They
also damaged the household articles kept in her house. On clamour being
raised, they fled from the spot. After registration of FIR, investigation
proceedings were initiated. During investigation, the petitioner was nominated
as an accused. Apprehending his arrest, he moved an application for grant of
anticipatory bail which was dismissed by the Court of Learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur vide order dated 01.09.2025.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been
falsely implicated in this case. He was not named in the FIR. His implication is
on the basis of alleged disclosure statement of co-accused Sarabjit Singh which
cannot be considered to be legally admissible in evidence. Moreover, his name
was taken after a delay of more than two and half years after the occurrence. No
specific overt act has been attributed to him. He is ready to join investigation.
His custodial interrogation is not required. No recovery is to be effected from
him. The co-accused Harbhajan Singh @ Sonu, Rashpal Singh @ Ghuddu,
Tralochan Singh @ Gori and Prabhjot @ Prabhjeet Kaur have already been
extended benefit of bail. It is, thus, argued that the petition deserves to be
allowed.
4. Status report has been filed. Learned State counsel has argued that
the presence of the petitioner at the spot was established on the basis of
disclosure statement of the co-accused. For conducting proper and thorough
investigation in the matter, his custodial interrogation is must. It is, therefore,
stressed that the petition does not deserve to be allowed.
AMIT SHARMA
2026.05.15 13:04
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE3##CRM-M-23087-2026 (O&M) 3
5. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by learned counsel
for the parties at considerable length.
6. The petitioner alongwith the co-accused is alleged to have formed
membership of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object
thereof is further alleged to have entered inside the house of the complainant and
damaged her household articles. He was not named in the FIR. No specific act
has been attributed to him. Given the nature of the allegations as levelled
against the petitioner and the above discussed facts, this Court is of the
considered opinion that the pre-trial incarceration of the petitioner is not
required. Even otherwise, pre-trial incarceration should not be a replica of post-
conviction sentencing. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is
ordered to be admitted to bail subject to the condition that the petitioner shall
surrender bef
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.