IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (128 Date of Decision:14.05.2026 SIMARJEET KAUR … Petitioner Versus MANINDER KAUR ... Respondent -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Karnesh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.

-.-

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The petitioner moves this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, invoking its extraordinary supervisory jurisdiction to impugn the legality, propriety, and jurisdictional competence of the order dated 02.04.2026 (Annexure P-1). By way of the impugned order, the learned Court below erroneously entertained and allowed the respondent- plaintiff’s application for restoration, thereby reviving a suit previously dismissed for non-prosecution and directing its restoration to its original numerical file. This revision seeks to address the patent illegality inherent in the lower Court's exercise of discretion.

2. The foundational facts giving rise to the present proceedings are that a civil suit instituted by the respondent-plaintiff was pending adjudication before the learned Civil Judge and was listed on 21.08.2024 for filing of reply to the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of