SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77425

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NARAIN DASS – Appellant
Versus
ANANT RAM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-12.05.2026 Narain Dass … Petitioner Versus Anant Ram ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present:- Mr. Liaqat Ali, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

*****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petition is directed against order dated 21.02.2017 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nakodar (Annexure P-6), whereby an application filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint stands declined.

2. The plaintiff filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 09.03.1994. The defendant was, however, proceeded against ex parte.

3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff suffered statement restricting his claim to be for alternative relief of recovery of Rs.75,000/- (Annexure P-3). The suit was decreed on 21.3.2012 by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nakodar vide ex parte decree.

4. The ex parte decree was later on set aside on the application filed by the defendant. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top