IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NARAIN DASS – Appellant
Versus
ANANT RAM – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-12.05.2026 Narain Dass … Petitioner Versus Anant Ram ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present:- Mr. Liaqat Ali, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
*****
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. The present revision petition is directed against order dated 21.02.2017 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nakodar (Annexure P-6), whereby an application filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint stands declined.
2. The plaintiff filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 09.03.1994. The defendant was, however, proceeded against ex parte.
3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff suffered statement restricting his claim to be for alternative relief of recovery of Rs.75,000/- (Annexure P-3). The suit was decreed on 21.3.2012 by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nakodar vide ex parte decree.
4. The ex parte decree was later on set aside on the application filed by the defendant. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.