Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NIRMALA DEVI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)
| 1. | Date when judgment was reserved | 28.04.2026 |
| 2. | Date of pronouncement of judgment | 12.05.2026 |
| 3. | Date of uploading judgment | 12.05.2026 |
| 4. | Whether operative part or full judgment is pronounced | Full |
| 5. | Delay, if any, in pronouncing of full judgment and reasons thereof | Not Applicable |
1. With the consent of all the parties, the aforementioned writ petitions are taken up together and are being decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CWP-3815-2001.
2. The writ petition (CWP-3815-2001) has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the letter dated 01.01.2001 whereby the services of the petitioners were terminated by respondent No.4. Further, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to frame a policy of absorption of employees working as Balsevikas as well as to grant them the same pay scale as has been given to some of their counterparts.
CONTENTIONS
3. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners has contended that the petitioners were appointed as Balsevikas, with various District Councils for Child
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
