IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JOGINDERI DEVI AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UMESH MISHRA AND ORS. – Respondent
FAO_4149_2023
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-4149-2023 (O&M)
Smt. Joginderi Devi and Others . . . . Appellants
Vs.
Umesh Mishra and Others . . . . Respondents
****
Reserved on: 06.05.2026
Pronounced on: 08.05.2026
Pronounced fully/opera:ve part: Fully
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Argued by:- Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate
for the appellants.
Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for
respondent No.3- Insurance Company.
****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
Claimants-appellants have filed the present appeal seeking en-
hancement of compensa*on awarded vide judgment/award dated 18.11.2022
passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonipat.
2. As borne out from the record, on 22.11.2021, deceased Arya, aged
about 22 years, was returning from Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak
along with his sister Nigam on a motorcycle. When they reached near the canal
a4er crossing village Rohtak, a Mahindra Pickup bearing registra*on No. HR-
69D-1137, being driven by respondent No.1 in a rash and negligent manner,
struck the motorcycle. Due to the impact, Arya and his sister fell on the road
and sustained injuries. Though his sister survived with minor injuries, Arya
succumbed to the injuries sustained in the accident while undergoing treatment
at Civil Hospital, Sonipat. FIR regarding the occurrence was duly registered
against respondent No.1.
NEETIKA TUTEJA
2026.05.08 14:50
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##FAO-4149-2023 (O&M)
3. The claim pe**on under Sec*on 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,
1988 was filed by the widowed mother, unmarried sister, unmarried brother
and married sister of the deceased seeking compensa*on from the driver,
owner and insurer of the offending vehicle. The respondents contested the
claim pe**on. Upon apprecia*on of the evidence, the learned Tribunal
concluded that the accident had occurred due to rash and negligent driving of
the offending vehicle and consequently awarded compensa*on of ₹48,67,016/-
along with interest in favour of the claimants.
4. The learned Tribunal assessed the monthly income of the deceased
at ₹29,568/- a4er excluding certain allowances from the salary of ₹36,728/-
reflected in the salary slip. Fi4y per cent addi*on towards future prospects was
granted, mul*plier of 18 was applied and deduc*on of 50% towards personal
expenses was made considering that the deceased was unmarried.
5. Assailing the award on the quantum of compensa*on, learned
counsel for the appellants has contended that the Tribunal erred in excluding
allowances from the salary of the deceased. It is argued that the deceased was
serving as a Constable in Haryana Armed Police and was drawing gross monthly
salary of ₹36,728/- as per salary slip Ex.P6. Reliance has been placed upon the
judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Na(cid:4)onal Insurance Company Limited
vs. Nalini and ors.” 2024 (2) PLR 671, to contend that allowances such as HRA,
transport allowance and other admissible benefits cannot ordinarily be
excluded while assessing income for the purpose of compensa*on. It is further
contended that the deduc*on towards personal expenses ought to have been
one-third instead of one-half because apart from the widowed mother, the
unmarried sister and unmarried brother were also dependent upon the
deceased. It is also argued that all the claimants were en*tled to filial
consor*um.
6. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Insurance
Company has argued that since the deceased was unmarried, the Tribunal
rightly applied 50% deduc*on towards personal expenses in view of the law laid
down in “Smt. Sarla Verma and ors. v. Delhi Transport Corpora(cid:4)on and anr.”,
NEETIKA TUTEJA
2026.05.08 14:50
I attest to the accuracy and Page 2 of 5
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##FAO-4149-2023 (O&M)
(2009) 6 SCC 121. It has also been contended that the income tax liability of the
deceased is liable to be deducted while compu*ng annual income.
7. I have heard learned counsel for the par*es and have carefully
gone through the record.
8. At the outset, it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.