IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GOLDI ALIAS GOLDI PALIWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
CRM-M_1323_2026
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-1323-2026 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-1323-2026 (O&M)
GOLDI @ GOLDI PALIWAL
... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent
1 The date when the judgment is reserved 05.05.2026
2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 08.05.2026
3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 08.05.2026
website
4 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full
pronounced or whether the full judgment is
pronounced
5 The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable
judgment and reasons thereof.
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Satnam Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab for respondent
****
MANISHA BATRA, J.
1. The instant one is the sixth petition filed by the petitioner under
Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”)
for grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.248 dated 19.10.2022
registered under Section 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,
1985 (for short “NDPS Act”) at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala.
2. As per the allegations on 19.10.2022, the petitioner was found in
conscious possession of 34,000 intoxicant tablets of Alprazolam and Tramadol
HCL. The previous petitions as filed by the petitioner had been dismissed on
AMIT SHARMA
2026.05.08 14:19
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE2##CRM-M-1323-2026 (O&M) 2
different dates. The last petition had been dismissed on 23.09.2025 by
observing that out of 13 only 03 prosecution witnesses remained to be
examined.
3. The main thrust of argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is
that even after dismissal of his previous petition, a period of 08 months and 15
days has elapsed, however, there has been no progress in the trial as 03
prosecution witnesses still remain to be examined. He has already suffered
incarceration for a period of 03 years, 06 months and 15 days. His prolonged
incarceration militates against his fundamental rights of personal liberty
guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. His antecedents are
clean. Each day spent by him in custody has furnished him a new ground to
move bail afresh for seeking concession of bail. It is, therefore, urged that the
petition deserves to be allowed.
4. Per contra, learned State counsel has argued that this one is a
successive petition without there being any substantial or drastic change in the
circumstances and hence, the petition does not deserve to be allowed. It is,
therefore, urged that the petition is liable to be dismissed.
5. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by learned counsel
for the parties at considerable length.
6. Undisputedly this is the sixth petition for grant of regular bail. Two
petitions as filed by the petitioner had been dismissed as withdrawn, whereas
others petitions were dismissed on different dates. However, for the last more
than 08 months, the trial has not proceeded further at all as 03 witnesses still
AMIT SHARMA
2026.05.08 14:19
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE3##CRM-M-1323-2026 (O&M) 3
remain to be examined. The petitioner has already spent a period of more than
03 years, 06 months and 15 days in custody. The allegations against him prima
facie make out a case for commission of the subject offences by the petitioner.
So far as the question of maintainability of this petition being successive one is
concerned, it may be mentioned that, an accused has a right to move successive
bail application for grant of bail and it is the duty of the Court, while
entertaining such a subsequent bail application, to consider that any fresh ground
which persuade it to take a view different from the one taken in the earlier
application is made out or not. It is also required to be noted that every day
spent by an accused in custody provides a new cause of action for filing a bail
application under certain circumstances. He cannot be kept in custody for
indefinite period and the bail applicat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.