IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

243-2 CRR-418-2021 (O&M)

Date of decision: 08.05.2026 Girish Mittal ...Petitioner Versus Vinod Kumar Sehgal and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Ms. Neeru Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab.

MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1. CRM-10383-2021 Prayer in this application is for compounding the offence in view of the fact that the parties have amicably settled their dispute.

Since the prayer made in this application has direct bearing on the main revision petition, the application is disposed of and let the main case, which is also listed today, be taken up.

2. CRR-418-2021 (O&M)

The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order on quantum of sentence, both dated 10.07.2019, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rajpura in complaint bearing No. COMA-742-2015, titled as Vinod Kumar Sehgal v. Girish Mittal filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘N.

I. Act’), whereby the petitioner wa